Revver Review - Part 2

What are people saying?

1. Jecklin said on September 15th, 2006 at 1:35 pm

   oh man, can you imagine being that poor guy or girl?!?!

   Reply
2. Loren Feldman said on September 15th, 2006 at 1:47 pm

   I can only imagine,they need a lot of these people.

   Reply
3. AndrewE said on September 15th, 2006 at 3:55 pm

   There are worse jobs, trust me.

   Reply
4. Loren Feldman said on September 15th, 2006 at 4:03 pm

   Andrew,
   I know. I worked the overnight at a fish processing plant in Brooklyn. Crazy shit. I knew I should have paid more attention in school.

   Reply
5. vAsPeRs the GRAte or said on September 17th, 2006 at 5:28 pm

   Revver could do what YouTube does: make users click on a statement that the users promise and declare, in a legally binding way, that no copyright infringement is in any of their content.

   This is why I have no music in my YouTube videos except for the computer music I make under the alias of CompuMusik.

   Why can’t Revver do that?

   Another idea is they could not only look at each video for copyright infringement, but also for quality.

   I hate to give away my secrets so freely, but this is the next business model: a YouTube type service that has only top quality video, instead of endless mountains of stupid mentos and Coke rockets, tire foam on fire, lip synching, and teens clowing around with horrible cameraphone video sludge.

   A quality video upload site, that has artistic and ethical standards, not just intellectual property guides.

   Reply

What do you think?