« My Prediction Is Failure | Home | I’m 42 Holy Crap »

Arrington v. Wilson

February 18, 2008 – 12:17 pm

Andrew Keen was correct.


Amateurs
Uploaded by 1938media

  1. 7 Responses to “Arrington v. Wilson”

  2. Of course Arrington would never whine about something that happened to his friends given his unbiased view of the blogosphere.

    By Lorraine Smith on Feb 18, 2008

  3. U rock man!!! will be in NY in march/april - lets hook up -

    —lol!!!! Haha…. So funny!

    later….

    will get back to what we briefly discussed… have like the killer tool for you guys!

    1938 MEDIA f#!*king BLASTING MAN!!! That “ironic” style of yours / way 2 cool man” MR. Feldmanizer!

    mrthanki /// ACROBATO.COM

    By Shaun on Feb 18, 2008

  4. Attention. That’s what it’s all about, you know this, so do they. It works. You just gave them more.

    By Jim Kukral on Feb 18, 2008

  5. What about bloggers, like e, who used to be journalists? Are we, um, journabloggers? Or is that blogalists?

    Just wondering…

    Mark

    By Mark Evans on Feb 18, 2008

  6. loren, did you get the chance to try this new seesmic-killer by yahoo ? http://live.yahoo.com
    really would love to have your opinion on this experiment. it’s like pre-alpha or post-zeta-whatever. check it out, will ya ?

    By steve on Feb 18, 2008

  7. btw, yahoo/live! video experiment launched while you were in busy spain, so I thought you might have just skipped the info or something. i think the video quality is pretty decent compared to seesmic, but most importantly, it allows to connect live broadcasters together, unlike the live qik service you’re using which is basically just about you and text chatting. I think the yahoo service is cool because anyone with a webcame may enter a discussion, and all this totally live, unlike seesmic.

    By steve on Feb 18, 2008

  8. Just saw a tweet from yer lady and thought I’d stop by and wish yer ass a happy birthday.

    peace

    By DIck on Feb 19, 2008

Post a Comment